Sergei Ganin

From Wikisocion

Sergei Ganin is the owner of Socionics.com, the first (since 1997) and most visited site on socionics on the web. Ganin studied socionics in Kiev, Ukraine before emigrating to London, England in the early 90s. He employs a four-function model of the psyche, visual identification, and four-letter type names (i.e. ESTp, INFj, etc.), and actively types celebrities. Ganin's self-typing is LII.

[edit] Ganin's views on visual identification

Ganin's articles on visual identification (particularly this one and Gulenko-based descriptions that include typical body features) have sparked considerable controversy among people in and out of socionics. Many readers in the English-speaking world have gotten the impression that visual identification is the primary method of type identification used in socionics. To fuel the controversy, Ganin has not provided any V.I. guidelines, giving the impression that it is a purely intuitive process or that the physical traits mentioned in the type descriptions on his site are sufficient to begin typing people.

Ganin's introductory article to V.I., his "V.I. skills test" (which is based on just one picture of each person without any other information or discussion and simply presents one "correct" answer), and his large gallery of celebrities with no evidence except for a single small picture, all suggest that he types people using V.I. methods alone. This gives newcomers to socionics the impression that single-picture V.I. is a reliable typing method that can be learned quickly.

However, Ganin has also said that he does not actually practice this type of visual identification. Another article on the subject suggests several points:

V.I. can only be mastered after one has mastered socionics theory.
Learning to visually identify types takes years of practice and vast experience studying people of known types (in other words, typed using different methods such as an understanding of functions or intertype interaction).
One photograph is almost never enough to make an accurate type diagnosis, and aging, plastic surgery, and makeup can make diagnosis more difficult.
Ganin's own approach is not formulaic and not based on specific physical features, but is based on a more general intuitive impression or overall feel.
Videos and meetings in person are considerably more informative than photographs.

His introductory article to the site also states that "VI cannot be mastered without mastering all other methods, plus it requires a great deal of experience" [1].

So it seems that Ganin's views on visual identification are actually rather moderate. However, the article is not featured prominently on the site, and readers are generally left with a different impression.

[edit] Ganin's views on the "hidden agenda"

"Hidden agenda" is Ganin's name for the mobilizing function. He states that this function is a sort of background motivation for a type's actions, not as immediately obvious as the Ego functions, but still there.

Ganin's articles on the hidden agenda, especially this one, have had a large impact on those for whom his site is the first introduction to socionics, even if they later discover other socionics sources.

He summarizes the hidden agendas as follows:

ENTp, ESTp => to be loved
INTj, INFj => to be healthy
ESFj, ESTj => to be perfect
ISFp, INFp => to understand
ENFj, ENTj => to be wealthy
ISTj, ISFj => to believe
ESFp, ENFp => to know
INTp, ISTp => to love

This concept is fairly consistent with the core concepts of socionics if it is properly understood what those agendas mean, and their functional causes, but they have led to some interpretations that exaggerate the significance and visibility of the mobilizing function, even mistaking the leading function or the creative function for it.

For example, "to know" refers to as a mobilizing function, and "to understand" to . By that it is meant that the SEE and the IEE will be inclined to give priority to accumulating pieces of knowledge on matters of their interest — "to know" — over trying to make those pieces of knowledge fit together in a logically consistent system (as in an ideology etc). By contrast, the SEI and the IEI will be inclined to focus on maintaining and improving their understanding of a consistent system of ideas and concepts — "to understand" — over accumulating information against which to check the validity of their concept.

This is valid of course for all types with the corresponding quadra values, but in the case of types with them as mobilizing and vulnerable functions, Ganin points out that some specific behavioral traits can be observed, especially after longer observation. This is also valid in classical socionics; the risk lies in misinterpreting the very brief definitions and their true significance in typing.